Welcome to the Sports Symposium!

The Sports Symposium is where you can come to receive a fresh view on everything in the world of sports. It will provide responsible and accurate articles in a voice that you will hopefully find unique. Like any good symposium, responses from the readers are not only highly encouraged, but highly valued. Enjoy!

Sunday, November 29, 2009

Jamal Crwaford: Trying to be more than just the guy who dunked on LeBron.

Posted on/at 3:21 PM by Kyle

Most college basketball players would be content with a career highlight of dunking on not only one of the best current NBA players, but arguably one of the best professional ballers of all-time. Jordan Crawford's dunk over LeBron James and the ensuing attempt by Nike to cover it up echoed throughout the basketball world this summer.

Since, both the play and Jordan Crawford have been forgotten. LeBron is well on his way to another MVP caliber season while Crawford has also begun play in Ohio, but at Cincinnati's Xavier University.

Crawford was never the likely suspect to dunk on the most physically gifted player in any sport that I have ever seen. A three-star prospect coming out of high school, Crawford was an anonymous recruit in an Indiana class that brought in six new freshmen including the best shooting guard of the class, Eric Gordon.

But Jordan emerged as a valuable role player on the 25-win Hoosiers team. He averaged nearly 10 points per game with reasonably efficient shooting percentages and solid contributions defensively. Unfortunately for Jordan and the University of Indiana, tragedy soon struck the basketball program as controversial coach Kelvin Sampson was once again hit up with recruiting violations and forced to step down.

Like many Indiana players, Crawford jumped ship as soon as that happened. He latched on at Xavier as one of the best transfer players, but was once again unheard of as NCAA rules forced him to sit out a year. Then, it happened.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8sL3KDhhUZ0&hl=en_US&fs=1&]

Jordan went Michael Jordan on LeBron and he instantly became one of the most popular players in the NCAA. He was doing interviews left and right, Nike and LeBron were fueling the fire, and it seemed like the story would never end.

It did end, and now Jordan is out to prove that he is more than that one trick pony. He has immediately became Xavier's go-to scorer, leading the team in points in four of the team's first six games. On the year, he is averaging 18.5 points, 5.7 rebounds and 2.5 assists to go with just 1.3 turnovers per game.

To go along with his positive assist to turnover ratio, he has also been efficient with his shooting, sporting a 47% clip from the field, 80% from the line and 48% from behind the arc. At 6'4", the ability to knock down that long-range jumper will dictate his pro prospects. We all know he has the leaping ability to play there.

What Crawford's future holds is uncertain, but on a solid collegiate team that has almost always made the NCAA tournament over the past 10-15 years, expect to hear about him again in March, and possibly in the pros someday.

Monday, August 3, 2009

2009 College Football Dark Horses

Posted on/at 12:42 PM by Kyle

Mid Major BCS Busters

Forget BYU, Boise State, Utah and TCU. These are the real BCS busters to watch this year.

East Carolina (9-5 in 2008)

East Carolina has made its name known the past couple years. Running back Chris Johnson put in the performance of the bowl season in 2008 and then went on to dominate the NFL as a rookie. Last year, the Pirates team made their mark by knocking off #17 ranked Virginia Tech week 1, then turned around and dominated the #8 ranked West Virginia Mountaineers the following week. It went downhill from there, however, and ECU stumbled through the rest of the year. They finished 9-5, capped off by a disappointing loss to Kentucky in their bowl game.

This year, there's no reason to expect a similar drop off. ECU returns every starter on offense except their tight end. On defense, they return every starter except their strong safety and one defensive end. That means they're returning 19/22 starters, along with both their kicker and punter. Like last year, they also have the opportunity to knock out a trio of BCS opponents in Virginia Tech, West Virginia and North Carolina. If they can knock out 2/3 teams like they did last year, they have the team to run away with a weak Conference USA and see a January bowl game.


Nevada (7-6 in 2008)

That's right; I'm telling you to look out for a WAC team not named Boise State. While Boise State only returns 11 starters from a team that went undefeated last year, Nevada returns 8 starters on both side of the ball, including one of the most prolific offenses in college football.

Nevada is led by a man by the name of Chris Ault, who invented the Pistol Offense. His QB is a lanky 6'6" dual-threat QB y the name of Colin Kaepernick. Kaepernick started as a freshman in 2007 and responded with 2175 yards, 19 TD's and 3 INT's passing to go along with 600 yards and 6 TD's on the ground in just 9 games. Last year, he continued his success, throwing for nearly 3,000 yards with 22 TD's, 7 INT's. His damage on the ground is what stood out though, as he ran for 1130 yards and 17 TD's.

Kaepernick is complemented by a running back by the name of Vai Taua who ran for over 1500 yards with 15 touchdowns, also as a sophomore last year. The offense also returns 4/5 offensive linemen and 3/4 of Kaepernick's top targets. The team isn't too strong defensively, but it does return 2 all-conference caliber DE's and 6 other defensive starters, so it should be at least a respectable unit. Schedule-wise, they have 2 very tough games @ Notre Dame and @ Boise State, but after that, they have smooth sailing. They should get two respectable wins from Missouri and Fresno State. This team has a legitimate shot at going undefeated, but can enter BCS discussion even with a loss to Notre Dame.


Central Michigan (8-5 in 2008)

The Chips return the mid major version of Tim Tebow, Dan LeFevour. LeFevour battled injuries last year and "only" had 2784 yards passing, 21 TD, 6 INT with 600 yards and 6 TD's rushing, but he was a 3000/1000 player as a sophomore and scored 46 TD's to boot (27 passing, 19 rushing). The 3-year starter returns his top 3 receiving threats and this offense should go out with a bang.

This year, they have no Ball State to worry about. Instead, the only conference game they might lose is @ Western Michigan. Their OOC schedule is respectable as they travel to both Michigan St. and Arizona, but both of those programs lost their main pieces from last year and CMU should be an underdog by no more than a few points in either game.


Big East Boss: Rutgers (8-5 in 2008)

Rutgers has one of the best chances of any team at going undefeated in 2009. No, I’m not that high on this team, but I am this low on that conference. Look at Rutgers’ schedule, it’s pathetic. They get USF, Cincinnati, Pittsburgh and West Virginia all at home and their only conference road games are Connecticut, Syracuse and Louisville, all on down years. Their toughest game might be @ Maryland, and that’s nothing. And get this, their other OOC games are Howard, FIU, Texas Southern and Army. Who? Exactly.

Don’t get me wrong, this team is solid as well. They lose Mike Teel, a 3-year starter and arguably their top 2 receivers, but return everything else, including a couple of experienced WR’s. At QB, they have a couple of senior QB’s to choose from for replacements. They also return the majority of a defense that only gave up more than 24 points once last year, and held 7 teams to less than 13 points. The team is far from BCS caliber, but they’re in a glorified mid major conference and should win 9-10 games.


Big 10 Buster: Illinois (5-7 in 2008)

Illinois had awful luck last year, with 6 of their 7 losses being decided by less than two scores, including games against #6 Missouri, #12 Penn State and #11 Ohio State. This year, they should have the senior leadership to close out games and contend for a Big 10 title. Their offense will be led by now senior QB Juice Williams and one of the best WR's in college football, Arrelious Benn. On defense, they boast one of the best linebackers in college football, Martez Wilson. With the entire defensive backfield returning behind him, Illinois should have a formidable defense.

I'm mainly high on Illinois because they are, without question, one of the most talented teams in the Big 10. Ron Zook has done a magnificent job recruiting at Illinois since he has got there. We saw him pull it together 2 years ago and lead the Illini to the Rose Bowl against USC. I fully expect him to lead this team to at least 9 wins again this year. While they have to travel to Columbus, their other road games are against bottom feeders Indiana and Purdue, along with a solid Minnesota squad. They get Penn State and Michigan State at home and they don’t have to play Wisconsin and Iowa. If they can upset OSU, they could very easily find their way to Pasadena once again.


SEC Sleeper: Tennessee (5-7 in 2008)

I don’t know what it is, but there’s something about Lane Kiffin that I like. Maybe it’s just his wife, but I think it’s his confidence. I have a feeling he’s going to step into Knoxville and make his mark on the field (he’s already made one off of it.) The Volunteers have a talented team that simply underachieved last year. They lost 3 games by less than 6 points and had a schedule that featured 4 top 15 teams. Kiffin continued to inject talent with a tremendous recruiting class and his father Monte should make the Vol defense one of the better ones in the country. Tennessee returns just about everyone on offense and most of the key pieces on defense, including all-world safety Eric Berry.

That said, Tennessee does have a very tough schedule this upcoming season. They have to Florida, Alabama and Mississippi and also have games against Georgia and Auburn (another sleeper candidate.) However, I still think this team will win 9 games and upset at least one of those teams on the road. Even if they aren’t a BCS contender, they’re certainly one to watch next year.

Sunday, July 12, 2009

The Future of Baseball: The San Francisco Giants Rotation

Posted on/at 8:31 PM by Kyle

Heading into this season, pretty much everyone would have put the San Francisco Giants near the bottom of the standings. A year removed from a 90-loss season, the only noteworthy addition the team made was the signing of 45-year old starting pitcher Randy Johnson.

Fast forward to the All-Star break, and the Giants are a surprising 10 games over .500 with a two game lead in the Wild Card race. The somewhat premature emergence of the portly power hitting Pablo Sandoval has helped, but the main reason this Giants team is succeeding is their pitching staff.

With a 3.49 ERA, San Francisco's starting rotation has the lowest ERA in baseball. That ERA is a fourth of a point better than Atlanta, the team in second place, and nearly a full point better than the major league average.

But here's the kicker: the rotation is only going to get better.

The Giants already boast arguably the top 1-2 punch in baseball with Tim Lincecum and Matt Cain. Lincecum, the 2008 NL Cy Young award winner, has somehow improved upon last year's spectacular season by walking nearly a full batter less per nine innings and lowering his ERA from 2.62 to 2.33.

"The Franchise" has overshadowed #2 Matt Cain, who is quietly having almost as impressive of a year. The former hard luck loser has already won 10 games in 18 starts this year after winning just 15 in 66 combined starts between 2007 and 2008.

Cain had always been a good pitcher though, recording 3.75 and 3.65 ERA's the past two years, respectively. But this year, he has taken a large step forward and lowered his ERA to a Lincecum-like 2.38. While it's unlikely that number will stay that low, he is a very good #2 starter without question.

However, what will set this rotation apart from the rest of the league is what is yet to come. Veteran pitchers Barry Zito and Randy Johnson will soon be replaced by two of the best prospects baseball has to offer.

Those two prospects are the left-handed Madison Bumgarner, and towering right-handed Tim Alderson. Both of whom the Giants selected in the first round of the 2007 draft.

At just 19 years old, Bumgarner has already reached and dominated AA with a 1.74 ERA through 9 starts this year. He has limited opponents to a .226 average or less at all three levels he has been to, and more importantly, has limited his walks as well.

His hype is not all production either. At 6'4" 215 lbs, he is well built and has the body to maintain the mid-90's heat he throws. Bumgarner is widely considered the best pitching prospect and one of the best overall prospects, now that Tommy Hanson has elevated to the major leagues.

Alderson is not far behind Bumgarner, ranking around the top 25 of all prospects in baseball. Alderson, 6'7", might not be the flamethrower you might imagine given his size, but he has shown reason to believe he will be a very good starter at the major league level.

With a low-mid 90's fastball, Alderson fires strikes and has the complementary pitches to get batters out without mowing them down. Only a year older than Bumgarner, Alderson is also in AA this year and is pitching well (2.97 ERA).

To finish it off, we cannot forget about the man who just took the league by storm with his no-hitter, Jonathan Sanchez. Sanchez is a very talented lefty with a major walk problem. Hopefully for the Giants, his outing on Friday was a sign of things to come.

Sanchez, 26 years old, still has a lot of time to get a handle on his control. Plus, it usually takes left-handed pitchers longer to develop than their right-handed counterparts (just do not tell Bumgarner that). His ability to strike batters out is very promising, as he has maintained over a strikeout per inning throughout his first 328 innings in the majors.

What is most impressive about what San Francisco has done is that these guys are all home grown. The Giants drafted all Lincecum, Cain, Alderson and Bumgarner in the first round, and they found Sanchez in the 27th.

The youth of this potential rotation is unreal, with none of them exceeding 26 years old. This rotation has the potential to go down as one of the best in baseball history, and we could see it together within the next year.

For baseball's sake, I hope the Giants are able to keep these guys together and avoid trading one of them for a hitter. If they can, this unit should be regarded as highly as those Maddux, Smoltz and Glavine led rotations the Braves had in the 1990's.

Three years ago, everyone would have laughed at this thought, but the Giants hold the key to the next decade.

Tuesday, July 7, 2009

The Pain of Indifference

Posted on/at 2:18 PM by Kyle

Elie Wiesel, a Nobel Peace Prize winning writer, once said, "The opposite of love is not hate, it's indifference; the opposite of art is not ugliness, it's indifference; the opposite of faith is not heresy, it's indifference; and the opposite of life is not death, it's indifference."

This is a quote that I was never able to relate to until I experienced the "Steroid Era" in baseball.

Like most kids growing up in the 1990's, I became enamored with the legendary home run chase of 1998 between Mark McGwire and Sammy Sosa. Even as a Brewer fan that w
as watching two division opponents slug it out; I loved it.

Then 2005 came along and the congressional hearing about steroids took place. Mc
Gwire and Sosa were put on the hot seat, and both players failed miserably.

Sosa read a prepared statement and then hid behind his 'lack of familiarity' with the English language while McGwire said 'I plead the fifth' about 40 different ways.

I was disappointed in these players to say the least, but nothing came close to the disdain I felt for Barry Bonds during the BALCO scandal. Barry's arrogant attitude combined with the mountain of facts against him made him the biggest villain since Darth Vader.

But good did come from the spite I felt for Barry Bonds. The good that came from it was hope.

I could look at Alex Rodriguez and Albert Pujols and look forward to the future. I ha
d faith that these clean players would return integrity to the record books and swiftly remove the home run crown from Bonds' bulking head.

The final dagger was stuck in me when A-Rod's positive 2003 test was revealed, and his subsequent admission to using performance-enhancing drugs was spoken. I could no longer hang my hat on anyone.

If a player with a track record like Alex Rodriguez's used steroids, then whom can we
trust? If probably the most talented and successful youngster most of us have ever seen used steroids, who didn't fall into that trap?

It's impossible to answer those questions, and that is where my indifference emerges.

Everyone is looking for a stance on Manny Ramirez. There's the usual range of unquestioning
support to undeniable hatred, and few people in-between.

However, in-between is where I am. I saw the Manny news and didn't look twice. I don't care that he was allowed to go on a rehab assignment prior to his return to the Dodgers, and I don't care that he has even returned. A fake 2003 steroid list was circled around, and I didn't care about that either.

I would give anything to return to my state of ignorance about steroids in baseball. I would even love to return to a time where I could funnel my anger towards a single player like Bonds, because at least that elevated other players.

In hindsight, I prefer the positive tests were never released. Alas, they were, and I can only look to the future. All I can do is dream of a clean game and for the romanticized word of "purity" to return to America's pastime.

When will that time come? Maybe never, and that's the pain of indifference.

ESPN's Bottom Line - Version 2.0